Medea Benjamin of Code Pink
speaking out at President Obama’s
speech on Foreign Policy.
In last night’s posting See, Say & Do there was a little quiz of distinguishing the pictures of destruction of homes by Mother Nature with the killer tornado in Oklahoma and the destruction of homes by US Commander-In-Chief with Killer Drones in Yemen and Pakistan. The answer, my friend, is below. I was going to do another quiz with pictures of children killed by tornado and by drones but I noticed that the pictures of children killed by tornado where of them alive and well where the pictures of children killed by US drones were of them bloodied and dead.
Today listening to Public Radio while driving I heard some commentator criticize and insult the woman, Medea Benjamin of Code Pink who interrupted President Obama’s speech on Foreign Policy. Actually I thought the commentator’s critical remarks were out of place. What can a citizen who loves their country deeply do about the terrible tragedy of Guantanamo Bay and Killer Drone strikes on suspected terrorist and innocent people? Are we to sign another petition or write the President? Medea Benjamin has written a book about “Drone Warfare, Killing by Remote Control” and knows the only way to be heard is by doing what she did, speak out during the speech.
Today I read her side of the story on “Why I Spoke Out at Obama’s Foreign Policy Speech.” Yes some would call her actions ‘rude’ but she would say President Obama’s policies, not those speaking out against them, are rude. Here is the text of her article.
Having worked for years on the issues of drones and Guantanamo, I was delighted to get a pass (the source will remain anonymous) to attend President Obama’s speech at the National Defense University. I had read many press reports anticipating what the President might say. There was much talk about major policy shifts that would include transparency with the public, new guidelines for the use of drones, taking lethal drones out of the purview of the CIA, and in the case of Guantanamo, invoking the “waiver system” to begin the transfer of prisoners already cleared for release.
Sitting at the back of the auditorium, I hung on every word the President said. I kept waiting to hear an announcement about changes that would represent a significant shift in policy. Unfortunately, I heard nice words, not the resetting of failed policies.
Instead of announcing the transfer of drone strikes from the CIA to the exclusive domain of the military, Obama never even mentioned the CIA—much less acknowledge the killing spree that the CIA has been carrying out in Pakistan during his administration. While there were predictions that he would declare an end to signature strikes, strikes based merely on suspicious behavior that have been responsible for so many civilian casualties, no such announcement was made.
“Speaking out isn’t rude… Terrorizing villages with Hellfire missiles that vaporize innocent people is rude. Violating the sovereignty of nations like Pakistan is rude. Keeping 86 prisoners in Guantanamo long after they have been cleared for release is rude.”
The bulk of the president’s speech was devoted to justifying drone strikes. I was shocked when the President claimed that his administration did everything it could to capture suspects instead of killing them. That is just not true. Obama’s reliance on drones is precisely because he did not want to be bothered with capturing suspects and bringing them to trial. Take the case of 16-year-old Pakistani Tariz Aziz, who could have been picked up while attending a conference at a major hotel in the capital, Islamabad, but was instead killed by a drone strike, with his 12-year-old cousin, two days later. Or the drone strike that 23-year-old Yemini Farea al-Muslimi talked about when he testified in Congress. He said the man targeted in his village of Wessab was a man who everyone knew, who met regularly with government officials and who could have easily been brought in for questioning.
When the President was coming to the end of this speech, he started talking about Guantanamo. As he has done in the past, he stated his desire to close the prison, but blamed Congress. That’s when I felt compelled to speak out. With the men in Guantanamo on hunger strike, being brutally forced fed and bereft of all hope, I couldn’t let the President continue to act as if he were some helpless official at the mercy of Congress.
“Excuse me, Mr. President,” I said, “but you’re the Commander-in-Chief. You could close Guantanamo tomorrow and release the 86 prisoners who have been cleared for release.” We went on to have quite an exchange.
While I have received a deluge of support, there are others, including journalists, who have called me “rude.” But terrorizing villages with Hellfire missiles that vaporize innocent people is rude. Violating the sovereignty of nations like Pakistan is rude. Keeping 86 prisoners in Guantanamo long after they have been cleared for release is rude. Shoving feeding tubes down prisoners’ throats instead of giving them justice is certainly rude.
At one point during his speech, President Obama said that the deaths of innocent people from the drone attacks will haunt him as long as he lives. But he is still unwilling to acknowledge those deaths, apologize to the families, or compensate them. In Afghanistan, the US military has a policy of compensating the families of victims who they killed or wounded by mistake. It is not always done, and many families refuse to take the money, but at least it represents some accounting for taking the lives of innocent people. Why can’t the President set up a similar policy when drone strikes are used in countries with which we are not at war?
There are many things the President could and should have said, but he didn’t. So it is up to us to speak out.
See where homes of destruction are below.
Destruction from Mother Nature in Oklahoma with killer tornado or destruction from USA Commander-in-Chief in Yemen or Pakistan with killer drones?
Tornado in Oklahoma
Drone attack in Pakistan
Tornado in Oklahoma
Drone attack in Yemen
Comments
(:commentboxchrono:)